The Hobbit was predicted to do well in theaters, and so far it has certainly done that. It has gathered $84.8 million in North America during the first weekend alone, and set the record for the most popular film opening in December, according to the Wall Street Journal. The big question of course is does the movie deserve its success? With a franchise such as this there is always the risk of disappointment, whether from fans or those to whom the novel is unfamiliar. Likewise, the legacy of the “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy puts addition pressure on the new series to live up to the family name.
The greatest difficulty in saying anything about “The Hobbit” is that one will automatically be assumed to be biased. If the comment is negative, then “The Lord of the Rings” fans will assume the critic is just venting dislike of the original trilogy on this new story. If the comment is positive however, the critic will be accused of being a fan just trying to uphold the Hobbit name. Admittedly, I did read “The Hobbit” once, but that was long ago, and I had honestly forgotten much of the story. Incredibly I have also only seen the beginning of one of the “The Lord of the Rings” movies. So while I entered the movie theater with the ghosts of characters floating in my mind, I could sympathize with those new to the Hobbit tale. Thus, my opinions are neither those of a Rings hater nor a Rings lover.
Some critics have argued that “The Hobbit” is long and dull. Personally, I feel that this statement is a bit harsh. Detailed is a better adjective I think. The creators of the film likely knew that they would make enough profit to produce two additional films. As a result, they likely did not feel the same pressure to fit everything of importance into a single movie. Now, they might have gotten a bit carried away. After all, nearly an hour was spent inside a hobbit hole, with no real action or adventure to speak of. But who knows? Perhaps the creators merely wanted to set the stage properly, and since the story will be told over the course of three films (and a predicted 9 hours total) it is understandable that the introduction should be a bit longer.
Unfortunately, I cannot say that “The Hobbit” was terribly original. There were all the expected tactics used in action/adventure movies; several life and death situations that the heroes barely made it out of, a villain who kills his messengers when they bring him bad news. In fact at one point, this same villain, upon seeing the protagonists in a desperate situation, smiles and laughs a long and evil laugh just like virtually every bad guy in recent history.
But to the movie’s credit, it did not fall into many pitfalls that similar works have fallen prey to. For instance, the 3D was lovely, even beautiful to watch. There were no cheap tricks where a projectile is hurled at the audience, and the panoramic views of nature (even if computer generated) were simply magnificent. By the end of the movie, I had forgotten I was wearing glasses.
In addition, there were no silly references to modern-day culture. The world in which the story was set was therefore original and consistent, making the characters and the plot seem all the more real. I said before that the movie was not very original, but honestly, the fans of the series would probably not have been very happy if it had been. Watching “The Hobbit” was very much like watching “The Lord of the Rings,” which is an aspect that I do not believe will be lost on such fans. And ultimately, it is for them that the film was created. Let’s not kid ourselves.
For those who have never read “The Hobbit” or any of “The Lord of the Rings” I would not recommend starting with “The Hobbit” film. While prior knowledge is not necessary for comprehension, it certainly makes the picture more enjoyable. For those who have read or seen “The Lord of the Rings” and liked it, you will not be disappointed. For those who did not like it, stay away. For those who have read “The Hobbit” before, go and enjoy. From what I remember of the book, the film has been pretty faithful. Finally, for anyone who does decide to go see “The Hobbit,” beware. It’s a good tale that is worth the patience, but you’ll have to wait another two years for the rest of the trilogy.